Ground beef: a risky choice for families and the planet

Story by Sally Kneidel, PhD, of sallykneidel.com

The New York Times reported on October 11 that eating ground beef is still risky.  Well, yes, but what’s new about that?  Of course it’s still risky. Every now and then the media decide to write up something about the hazards of beef as though it were new, but the situation remains as it has been for some time.

The New York Times article focused on E. coli, a short name for the bacterium Escherichia coli. We all have E. coli in our intestines; most strains of E. coli are harmless.  But one strain can be deadly to humans, causing bloody diarrhea and kidney failure. That strain is E. coli 0157.  It lives in the bowels of half of the beef cattle in the United States. A very small number of these bacteria can kill you – some say as few as ten bacterial cells.

A beef-cattle feedlot.  Photo courtesy of http://oceanworld.tamu.org

Virtually all cattle in feedlots  spend their days and nights standing around in manure, and so their coats are usually contaminated with E. coli 0157.  Keeping the bacteria out of their meat is a challenge. After cattle are killed in a slaughterhouse, the carcasses pass through a hot-steam area, then are sprayed with a disinfectant to get rid of E. coli 0157.  In some slaughterhouses and processing plants, the carcasses are irradiated.  The radiation kills bacteria, although there is some debate about effects that irradiated food may have on human consumers.

Young Dancer Paralyzed by E. coli

In the U.S., there are occasional outbreaks of E.coli 0157 poisoning, where several people in one town will become extremely ill and a few may die.  Since children eat half the hamburgers sold in the U.S., the victims are often children.  The poisoning is usually traced to a single hamburger restaurant that has a batch of meat contaminated with E. coli 0157.  The New York Times article featured a children’s dance instructor, Stephanie Smith, who was left paralyzed at the age of 22 after ingesting a hamburger contaminated with E.coli 0157 in 2007.

Before the advent of feedlots, dangerous E. coli from cattle could not survive in human digestive tracts because our stomachs were too acidic for them. But the unnatural corn diet fed to beef cattle in feedlots, to marble their flesh  and increase their weight gain, increases the acidity of cattle’s stomachs so that it’s more similar to ours. So the cattle’s E. coli 0157 have adapted to a more acidic stomach and now can survive in our stomachs too.

A Possible Solution

It doesn’t have to be this way. According to a study by Dr. James Russell at Cornell University, feeding cows their natural diet of hay instead of corn for only five days before slaughter will reduce the acidity in their stomachs and get rid of the acid-loving and dangerous E. coli 0157. Any remaining E. coli would not be able to survive in our acidic stomachs and so would not be dangerous to humans..

Of course, if cows were not fed corn in the first place, but were fed hay or allowed to graze, then we wouldn’t have any problem at all with the dangerous E. coli 0157.  So, remind me, why is it that cattle are fed corn?  Oh yes, it’s that familiar corporate incentive:  shaving pennies from production costs to maximize profits. Because corn-fed cattle gain more weight and gain it faster, they make more money for beef producers. And we Americans have gotten used to that fat-laced meat and now prefer it.

Is beef worth the risks, and the ecological down-side?  You might be surprised at how fast you can get used to a life without beef. Aside from the E. coli issue, consider that a recent Worldwatch document declared beef  and dairy products to be the two ecological “hot spots” in our diet – that is, the two diet items whose production does the most long-lasting damage to the planet.

Anyone for a Tofurkey sausage?  All plant-based and indescribably delicious.

Sources:
Sally Kneidel, PhD, and Sadie Kneidel. 2005. Veggie Revolution: Smart Choices for a Healthy Body and a Healthy Planet. Fulcrum Books.

BBC Online Network. “Change of Diet Could Defeat Killer Bug.”  http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/169255.stm

Sarah DeWeerdt. “Is Local Food Better?”  Worldwatch Institute

Michael Moss. E. coli path shows flaws in beef inspection. October 11, 2009.  New York Times.

Photo courtesy of http://oceanworld.tamu.org

Posted in Food, Sustainable choices for your home, Sustainable Living, Veggie Revolution (co-authored with Sadie Kneidel) Tagged with: ,

New study: chicks can add and subtract

This post now on Google News (10/9/09)

Chickens get a pretty bum rap as the dumbest of animals. Maybe that’s why few people have much sympathy for the plight of chickens in our food industry. Take, for example, the hatcheries that produce the hens that lay our table eggs. Male chicks from these hatcheries are superfluous, since table eggs are infertile. The egg industry needs females only, for the most part. So male chicks are tossed, alive, into dumpsters. Take a look at the film Peaceable Kingdom by Tribe of Heart for clear footage of this interesting phenomenon. Or the photos in Animal Factories by Jim Mason and Peter Singer.

Live male chicks in a dumpster. Photo courtesy of www.tomregan-animalrights.com

Anyway – this post is good news about chicks! Interesting news. I read in Science News that chicks only 3 or 4 days old show evidence of adding and subtracting. Italian scientist Rosa Rugani and her colleagues from the University of Trento Center for Mind/Brain Sciences designed experiments that involved adding and removing objects from little piles hidden behind screens. She reports in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B that the chicks did a pretty good job of keeping track of the objects, equivalent to problems such as 4 – 2 = 2 and 1 + 2 = 3.

Rugani says this is the first demonstration of adding and subtracting in young animals other than humans. Other animals, such as dogs and chimps, have demonstrated mathematical talents as adults. Karen Wynn, of Yale University, says that Rugani’s work is “compelling evidence that numerical understanding comprises a built-in system of unlearned knowledge.”

So why would chicks need to know how to count? Chicks hang out in groups. As youngsters, they’ll even hang out with little plastic balls about the same size as a chick. In the experiment, each chick watched as an experimenter hid balls behind two screens, then moved some of the balls from one screen to the other. When the ball-moving was over, each chick was allowed to wander. Around 75% of the time, the chicks scampered over to the screen that wound up with the most balls – indicating that they’d been keeping track of the adding and subtracting.

Photo courtesy of Science News and Rosa Rugani et al.

I have serious reservations about animal experiments in general. But behavioral experiments such as these, that demonstrate animal intelligence, are valuable. I can’t help but hope that some day more people will “get it.” Animals, especially vertebrates, are sentient beings that deserve a lot more consideration than we give them.

Sources:
Susan Milius. Hatchlings may add, subtract: results point to built-in numerical understanding. Science News, April 25, 2009.

Jim Mason and Peter Singer. Animal Factories.


Tribe of Heart. Peaceable Kingdom.

Tom Regan – Animal Rights

Key words: chickens animal rights animal intelligence chicks can count

Posted in Wildlife

My visit to a traditional healer in Africa: “Call on your female ancestors”

All text and photos by Sally Kneidel, PhD, of sallykneidel.com

Caiphus – a medicine man I consulted with in the African village of Welverdiend. This photo is with his little daughter, Queen, in front of his home in June 2009.

The village of Welverdiend, South Africa, is one of my favorite places in the world. I’ve never met a more positive, forward-thinking group of people, determined to bring about progressive change. In the two and a half years since I’ve known them, they’ve faced some daunting challenges, such as unemployment and vanishing natural resources, but have come up with solutions I would never have dreamed of. Ken and I were stunned when we learned what they’ve accomplished.

Ken and I first visited Welverdiend in 2007, at the advice of Dr. Laurence Kruger who directs an ecology program in Kruger National Park, and Dr. Wayne Twine who studies resource use by villages just outside of Kruger Park. Welverdiend is one of the villages Twine studies. During our first visit, I was enthralled by the conversations we had in Welverdiend – how willing the villagers were to talk frankly about their difficulties with diminishing fuel wood, diminishing river sand for bricks (due to drought), damage to crops and livestock by elephants and lions, etc. For people like myself who are curious about lives that are different from our own, Welverdiend is a hot spot of interest. If you visit, you’ll come away inspired and enlightened. Or at least I did. Click here and here to see my stories and pictures from our first visit in 2007. Click here for the pics and story of our June 2009 visit. What a wonderful group of people!

But what I really wanted to write about today was one of the most interesting parts of the visit, both years. That was visiting the sangoma, or medicine man. I know that consumer demand for traditional Chinese and Asian medicines is a major threat to the survival of tigers, bears, rhinos and dozens or probably hundreds of other species. Traditional African and Latin American medicine also involve the use of animal parts, to some degree. I don’t know whether the use of animal parts by sangomas in Africa is contributing to the demise of threatened species, but it can’t be helping. For that reason, I didn’t accept any medicines on my first visit, and during my second visit I accepted only a couple of plant-based powders.

Welverdiend has more than one sangoma; I think two of them are women. I had no preference, and my friend Clifford made an appt for me to see the sangoma Caiphus. In 2007 Clifford and friend Robert went with me to translate, and Ken my husband went too.

Ken, Clifford, and Robert (l to r) with me in Caiphus’ consulting room, 2007

The 2007 visit was really more of an interview than a doctor’s appointment, but Caiphus did “throw the bones for me,” a diagnostic practice. He told me that there was nothing wrong with me, but he offered me a drink from a jar of fluid with some unidentified stuff floating in it, just in case. I declined politely and we all laughed. Then Caiphus said Ken was sick. (He was.) He recommended that Ken keep taking the medicine he’d brought with him from the States.

Caiphus in his “office” as a medicine man, with some of his tools in 2007

On my second visit, in 2009, I went to see Caiphus as a patient or client. I took only my friend from Welverdiend, Clifford, to act as translator. Caiphus greeted us in front of his house with little Queen. We chatted a while then I told Caiphus that there was a situation in my life that was causing me distress, and I wanted his diagnosis and advice, although I didn’t want to be prescribed any medicines made of animal products. (Sangomas treat non-medical problems too, such as mine.)

So we went into his front room, where he keeps his diagnostic tools and his remedies.

My friend Clifford and Caiphus, 2009
The walls in Caiphus’ room are lined with his collection of medicines (2 pics below)



Most of his medicines looked like teas, or powders, or crumbled dried plants. We sat down on animal skins he had on the floor, Queen at her daddy’s knee. I asked what kind of skins they were; Caiphus said duiker and impala (local species of antelope) and jackal. Impala are abundant in the park, duiker are common. I know jackals are heavily persecuted by farmers who complain about jackals killing poultry, etc. I didn’t ask him where he got the skins (below).

He had a dried elephant foot that he said is used for people who come to him with foot ailments (visible as the gray blob on the white plate in the second picture of his bottles and jars). I know that Kruger Park staff at times shoot elephants who are destroying crop fields or causing persistent problems and give the meat to villagers. This is probably how he got the foot. Caiphus also had a wildebeest tail that he said is used to cleanse patients who have been “bewitched by evil spirits.” He said a lot of the “medicine” that works with the wildebeest tail is actually stuffed into the handle affixed to the tail.

The wildebeest tail with handle

He demonstrated how it works by holding the handle and sweeping Clifford with the wildebeest tail. We all laughed. We spent a lot of time laughing. Caiphus is friendly and funny, and he put me quite at ease.

Anyway, I described my problem to Caiphus, a problem which involved a situation with another person that was causing me some angst. To come up with the treatment for my distress, Caiphus collected his small bones, shook them vigorously, spoke to the bones in Shangaan, and then threw them down on one of the animal skins. He spent some time studying them and pointing out their meaning to us with his stick, as Queen began to nod off.

Below, a closer view of his bones (which include a domino, a few coins, a sea shell)

I asked Caiphus what the bones were, and he said they were the knees of sheep, goat, impala, duiker, warthog, lion, leopard, tortoise, and marula. Marula is a plant, so I don’t know what that meant. Queen at this point put her head on her dad’s knee, asleep (below).

I wish I’d asked him how he acquired the knees of these animals, but I didn’t. Why didn’t I? I was dismayed to hear lion and leopard in the list, though. I can only hope that the animals weren’t killed for the sake of procuring their knee bones for the sangoma. I know that villages living around the park sometimes kill predators who are killing their livestock. I’m guessing this is how he got the leopard and lion knees, or maybe he bought them. As I was ruminating over this, Caiphus reached behind himself, pulled out a cloth, folded it carefully, and tenderly placed it under Queen’s head.

Queen snoozes on the little pillow her dad made

Anyway, here’s what he said the bones told him about me: I need to appeal to my female ancestors to intercede in my behalf. He also said something of value is coming my way. In order to properly ask my female ancestors to influence my affairs, I need to get a white cloth and a checked cloth, put a 100-rand bill (South African money) between the two cloths and sprinkle some brown powder over the cloths. Then I need to ask my female ancestors to clear the way for this thing of value to come to me, whatever it is. The brown powder was a ground-up tree root, he said.

Secondly, I needed to put brown powder #2 (a different kind of tree root) into a bath tub of water. Then I needed to speak outloud to my female ancestors about the solution I would like to happen regarding the situation at home that’s bothering me. Next, I should put some of the yellow powder in a glass of water, sit down in the bath water, and drink the glass with the yellow powder in it.

He put the brown powder for the cloths in a used snuff can and gave it to me. He deftly wrapped the two powders for the bath procedure into separate packets make entirely of newspaper.

The packets of ground tree roots, and the brown tree root in the snuff can

We talked for a couple more minutes, then Clifford and I jumped up. We were going to take a ride through the Mozambique neighborhood of Welverdiend. The Mozambique population moved into the area as refugees from political turmoil in Mozambique, and they are not as far along the road to Westernization as the Shangaan Welverdiend residents. For example, I believe he said they have no running water, and their schools have fewer supplies, etc.

On our way out, Caiphus showed us some medicinal herbs he was drying in the sun

Then Clifford and I were off for our visit to the Mozambique area.

Children on the Mozambique side of town, walking home from school.

Would I recommend to anyone else to consult with a sangoma about a problem? If you have a latent anthropologist in yourself, like I do, then by all means Yes! Other ways of life fascinate me. About the matter of their using animal skins and animal bones (the wildebeest tail and elephant foot) – tell them that American tourists (or whatever nationality you are) don’t like the idea of using animal parts from animals that might be declining in number. I should have encouraged Caiphus to use only the bones of domestic animals or truly abundant animals, like scrub hares or impala.

I like Caiphus a lot; it’s impossible not to like him. I like him for being such a kind father to his little girl, for laughing so readily, for providing a good home for his family in a lovely town like Welverdiend, for suggesting that I call on my female ancestors who have power. I like that last idea. I like it a lot. Even though most of the people of Welverdiend will tell you that they are Christian, they blend the old with the new. I understand that their church services are quite an experience. I could hear them from a distance when I was there on a Sunday, but didn’t get a chance to attend. Next time I’m there, I will. I long to be in Welverdiend.

Check out on their website what Welverdiend is doing to prepare for the 2010 World Cup in South Africa. The village’s new resort will be ready to house and feed dozens of athletes from all over the world, with an Olympic-sized pool for exercising. By June of 2010, Welverdiend will also have a wildlife preserve with safari vehicles. It makes me want to cry. If you could see how much they’ve changed since 2007… These are people who have amazing drive and spirit. I just want to be around them. I want to be there…now.

All text and photos by Sally Kneidel, PhD, of sallykneidel.com

Posted in Wildlife

Plush Toilet Paper Flushes Old Forests

Pictured above, one of hundreds of logging trucks I saw in Washington State, carrying what the locals called little “pecker poles” – because the available mature trees are gone.  Photo by Sally Kneidel.

American’s insistence on soft thick toilet paper is an unnecessary threat to the world’s old-growth forests, says a report published Thursday in the Washington Post.

What exactly constitutes a luxury toilet paper and why is it so costly to the environment?

A sheet of toilet paper (made of wood fibers) can be rated on 3 aspects of softness:

  • surface smoothness
  • bulky feel
  • “drapability” or lack of rigidity

As it turns out, very old trees have longer wood fibers which make a product higher in the 3 desirable qualities above.

Fibers from younger trees make a paper that feels somewhat rougher than the most luxurious brands like Cottonelle and Quilted Northern Ultra Plush.

But is it really that different? Not to me. My family buys either Seventh Generation toilet paper or Green Forest brand from Planet Inc., both of which are made entirely from recycled paper. I have a roll of Green Forest right here and it feels very soft to me. I can’t imagine that any increase in softness would make a difference in comfort. Marcal Manufacturing, in New Jersey, makes toilet paper from recycled paper too, although I haven’t seen it in stores around my town.

Pine plantations likened to a line of Walmart stores

Old-growth forests, and all native forests, are already in a world of trouble from the timber industry. International timber companies are going after every unprotected and accessible forest on the planet. In the southern United States, where I live, more than 32 million acres of mature forest have been clear-cut and replaced with sterile monoculture plantations of loblolly pine. These pine plantations (not native to the areas where they’re planted) are devoid of animal life. They are managed chemically with pesticides, and competing undergrowth is generally removed, so that the insect life and spacial heterogeneity necessary to support an ecosystem are entirely missing. E.O. Wilson, a Pulitzer Prize winning Harvard ecologist, called pine plantations the ecological equivalent of a line of Walmart Stores. The U.S. Forest Service projects that by the year 2040, pine plantations will occupy 54-58 million acres of southern forests, almost a third of the south’s total 200 million forested acres.

We all know what the timber industry has done to the Pacific Northwest. When I visited the Olympic peninsula of Washington State just a couple of years ago, I passed more loaded timber trucks than I did cars. A local told me that the trucks were all headed to the harbors of Seattle, where the timber will be shipped overseas.

Southeast Asia has hardly any remaining stands of old-growth forest left, which is one reason that the orangutan is seriously endangered. It has almost no remaining habitat.

In African rainforest, and in the Amazon, international timber and paper companies have created access roads into the most impenetrable forests – roads that provice access to those who would harvest the wildlife, access for settlers who will slash and burn forest trees to make cattle pastures. The roads also provide egress for previously sequestered pathogens, such as the Ebola virus and perhaps HIV.

True, toilet paper accounts for only 5% of the world’s forest-products industry. Paper and cardboard packaging make up 26%, although more than half is from recycled products. Newspapers account for 3%.

Half the world uses no toilet paper

But 5% is far higher than it needs to be. In Africa, most bathrooms have no toilet paper. You might find a newspaper or a magazine you can tear lying in the outhouse….or you may find nothing. In Latin America, the toilet paper is thin yet adequate. But it must be thrown in the trash can; Latin American plumbing can’t handle it. Why do Americans have to have everything deluxe? The rest of the world is growing tired of our overconsumption. A growing number of Americans are getting impatient with it too.

Ask your grocer to stock Seventh Generation, which makes a variety of sustainable products.

For more information on the timber industry, check out the Dogwood Alliance website. It’s a great nonprofit whose sole mission is to educate and lobby on behalf of sustainable forestry practices. They have a wealth of information on various campaigns to protect forests and stop destructive corporations.

Or read our last book, Going Green: A Wise Consumer’s Guide to a Shrinking Planet. We have a whole section on how to find and choose sustainably made paper and wood products.

Help protect our forests and wildlife habitat! Skip the ridiculous ultra plush and ask your grocer to stop carrying it.

Key words:: plush toilet paper industry timber industry forest products Dogwood Alliance Washington Post ebola virus southern forests clear cuttting pine plantations E.O. Wilson Going Green Sally Kneidel Sadie Kneidel wildlife harvesting forestry roads old growth forests

Sources:
David Fahrenthold. Environmentalists Seek to Wipe Out Plush Toilet Paper. Washington Post. September 24, 2009

Dogwood Alliance, in particular Scot Quaranda of the Dogwood Alliance

Sally Kneidel, PhD, and Sadie Kneidel. Going Green: A Wise Consumer’s Guide to a Shrinking Planet. 2008. Fulcrum Publishing

See my previous post about the timber industry and the illegal trade in wildlife.

Scot Quaranda of the Dogwood Alliance, a nonprofit that promotes sustainable forestry practices. Photo by Sally Kneidel.

Posted in Environmental footprint, Going Green (co-authored with Sadie Kneidel), Sustainable choices for your home, Sustainable Living, Wildlife, Wildlife habitat Tagged with: , ,

Green & Frugal Tip: Use the outdoors to increase your living space

All text and photos by Sally Kneidel at sallykneidel.com I visited my dear friends Kathleen Jardine and Jim Cameron again last weekend. They have the coolest home I’ve ever seen. It’s a true passive-solar design and has solar thermal panels on its durable steel roof, but it looks like a French country cottage! I arrived at the home’s lovely east end (above) which has vines growing on trellises. The vines help the wide overhangs to block sun from the windows in summer, keeping the interior cool. As I paused in the yard, I saw flowerbeds…everywhere I turned (above and below) Then I walked in and saw in the entry-way the little Buddha statue and the Japanese-style shoe rack, and I felt a little rush of pleasure. Everything in this home seems intentional, aesthetic, and practical, all rolled into one – unlike my own home, awash with clutter. I took my shoes off and put them on the rack (optional), then walked barefoot on the lovely scored and red-tinted concrete floor that gives the home such a warm feel. The floor is also a perfect thermal mass for the passive solar design. I turned the corner into the living room, hollering yoo-hoo for Kathleen, and saw the enticing garden through the south-facing windows (below). The house is so pretty, it’s just a pleasure to immerse myself in it. Kathleen’s luscious paintings line the walls opposite the windows, and I admired them all the way to the dining room, with its vine-draped French doors (below). Their house is not only the most beautiful home I know of, it’s also probably the greenest in terms of energy-efficiency and durability. Kathleen and Jim design and build passive-solar homes, and sell passive-solar house plans. Check out their website at www.sungardenhouses.com. Kathleen and Jim are both artists – I met them in college when Jim was throwing pots, majoring in art, and Kathleen was already painting, drawing, and stitching and who knows what. They’re both bold people of action, proven fully capable of turning dreams and principles into reality, and making a livelihood of it. That’s something I really admire. It’s not easy to convert ideals to income. As a writer, I’ve struggled with that for many years… Anyway, back to my Green Tip. Here it is, something I learned from Kathleen and Jim, who are featured in my last book (Going Green). The tip is “annex the outdoors.” That wouldn’t have made any sense to me before I met them, but it makes so much sense now. Annexing the outdoors means building your home in such a way that the outdoors feels like part of the home: traffic in and out of doors is easy, and your outdoor space is a desirable place to be. As lovely as Kathleen and Jim’s home is, their outdoor space rivals it. Soon after I arrive for any visit, we almost always go outside to sit by their burbling goldfish pond and catch up on all our news. If Jim is home, all three of us go. If it’s evening, we may have a glass of wine and some snacks, or even dinner on the table by the pond. The flowers by the fish pond (above and below). The table between the fish pond and the bird feeders, where we have our refreshments (below). Isn’t it inviting? The benefit to counting the outdoors as living space is that you have much more square footage of living space, without the expense of enclosing and heating it! You save on materials, you save on energy-bills, you help the planet by using less power and fewer materials. Plus you have the tremendous psychological benefit of spending more wholesome time outdoors under the open sky. To make full use of your outdoor area, here are a couple or three guidelines: 1) Walking out the door should be effortless, which means that the floor should be level or almost level with the ground so that no steps are needed. A lack of steps also means no wear and tear on the knees, one of the first body parts to show wear as people age. Kathleen and Jim’s houses are supremely durable and low-maintenance, with low energy bills, so you can stay put forever if you like. 2) As Kathleen and Jim have done in their own home, consider putting a stove and a shower outdoors – roofed but without walls other than perhaps a shower curtain for privacy. Outdoors, the heat of cooking and showering doesn’t heat up or steam up the house. Plus, it’s really fun to cook outdoors, and to shower outdoors. Eating and cleaning up feel like an adventure! 3) Consider a regular dining area outdoors. It doesn’t have to be on a patio or deck – Kathleen’s and Jim’s outdoor table and chairs just rest on the ground and they’re fine. After we got through eating during my recent visit, the vet had arrived to look at their horse’s eye. So we went to greet the vet and watch what she was doing, which was entertaining. In the photo below, yet another vine-draped lovely trellis covers the gate into the horse corral and barn area. Callie the horse awaits the vet (below) on this misty evening. While waiting, Callie eats her dinner (below). Kathleen’s and Jim’s barn is as immaculate as their house, and just as pretty, in its barn-like way. Kathleen brings out Baboo the pony (a.k.a. Pootsnack) to join in the fun. Pootsnack is wondering who I am (above). The next morning, Sleety the accomplished Jack Russell terrier demonstrated one of her many talents in jumping on Kathleen’s back and clinging like a book satchel! I was impressed at Sleety’s numerous feats of daring, but the backpack imitation was especially endearing. And with that final adieu to the people and animals who live in this wonderland of loveliness, I hopped in my car and made my way to Chapel Hill, to eat lunch with my son. Btw, my son Alan concurs that Kathleen and Jim’s home is the loveliest place he’s ever seen, and the perfect abode in his own mind’s eye.

Web sites to check out:

www.sungardenhouses.com

www.kathleenjardine.com

http://goodbykneidel.blogspot.com

http://veggierevolution.blogspot.com

Key words:: energy-efficiency passive solar green homes sungarden houses sun garden houses using the outdoors for living space saving materials saving space

All text and photos by Sally Kneidel at sallykneidel.com

Posted in Energy-efficient housing, Environmental footprint, Going Green (co-authored with Sadie Kneidel), Sustainable Living, Wildlife Tagged with: , , ,

Monkeys persecuted as “pests”

Text and all photos by Sally Kneidel, PhD
A wild adult female vervet monkey in my friend’s backyard in South Africa

Primates fascinate me. I love coming face to face with another animal who’s so much like me – the good, the bad, and the ugly. I wanted desperately to see monkeys in Africa. It’s easy to imagine that they have human feelings, because they do; in fact, mammals in general have emotions similar to our own. Their brains have the same structures as ours; the structures just differ in their relative size. Mammals can experience fear, longing, anger, curiosity, boredom, rivalry or jealousy, frustration, the urge to mate, the urge to nest and nurture their offspring, the fierce drive to protect their young from harm…

A vervet monkey showing fear or an appeasement “grin” at a monkey with a higher rank.

And for those primates and other mammals or birds who are social animals (living in social groups), they feel “pleasure” in the company of one another and in grooming each other. Chimpanzees even clean one another’s teeth.

A social group of vervets (photo above) foraging for fruit together in my friend’s backyard in South Africa

Africa is a good place to see primates, especially the great apes. South America is a good place too. The Tamshiyacu-Tahuayo Reserve in the Peruvian Amazon has more primates than any other reserve in the world – at least 14, maybe 16 species. Several of them are marmosets or tamarins. Alas, I haven’t been there. I haven’t seen a profusion of primates on my few trips to Latin America, because I haven’t been to the best places. And many of the primates I have seen have been someone’s pet, or for sale in the marketplace for a dollar or two. I wrote about the Belen Market in Iquitos, Peru, in a previous post. Man, that was an eye-opener. The monkeys on string leashes, on human shoulders or laps, and in cages were so sad…and disturbing. I didn’t see monkeys on strings or in cages in Africa. I don’t know why. Maybe those that are captured are sold as bushmeat.

Anyway, in South Africa this past June, we were really happy to see four species of primates in the bush: vervet monkeys, Chacma baboons, lesser bushbabies, and thick-tailed bushbabies. All of them thrilled and delighted me. Just a few words about the vervet monkeys here, and I’ll write about the others later. Vervet monkeys reminded me of the capuchins in Latin America, the famous “organ grinder” monkeys and “helping hand” monkeys for people with quadraplegia.

A white-faced capuchin in Manuel Antonio National Park, Costa Rica. He’s angry and threatening because I intruded on his troop’s foraging route along the coastal fruit trees.

The size and proportions of vervets are similar to capuchins. And just like capuchins, vervets get into picnic baskets, beach bags, and outdoor kitchens – they’re not afraid of mooching off humans, and meddling in human belongings. I heard more than one South African describe vervet monkeys as “pests.”

Vervets raiding a neighbor’s outdoor kitchen at Satara rest camp in Kruger National Park
(pics above and below)

Vervets searching our outdoor kitchen for food in Punda Maria rest camp in Kruger Park (below).
The vervets wouldn’t let me get close to them; when I tried they ran away. All mammals have a “minimum distance” that they’ll tolerate. Only the sight or scent of food will make them come closer. Which is unfortunate, since feeding wildlife is almost always a bad idea. It leads to malnutrition, illness, and premature death.
The vervets around our kitchen were persistent. They hung around the perimeter of our porch, waiting for us to go inside.
Finally they scored a piece of bread (below) by opening a bag when we stepped inside for a moment.

I felt bad! But I learned my lesson. Food has to be taken inside or locked up. Without exception!

One day I was sitting on the back steps at my friend’s house in South Africa, and I could hear a troop of vervet monkeys coming toward his yard through the trees. Vervets make at least 36 distinct sounds, including barks, chutters, chirps and grunts. Each has its own context and meaning. I know that a couple of my friend’s neighbors feed the vervets because I’ve seen them do it. So as soon as the vervets spotted me sitting on the steps, with my feet on the grass, a few of them hopped to the roof and peered down at me, to see what I might have in my lap. Nothing.

The vervets peering down at me from the roof to see if I had any food (photo above).

I didn’t shoo them away. I didn’t do anything but hold my camera, sit still, and look at them. Pretty soon a few crept closer on the ground, to see what I might toss their way. They came closer, hopeful. Below…interested, but pretending not to be.

Inching closer.
Closer still, but still averting the eyes and feigning disinterest.
Closer indeed, and quite ready for the handout. But, alas, no snacks were forthcoming….and soon they wandered away.

Another time we were at Pafuri Picnic spot in South Africa where an African family was having a fragrant cookout, and vervets converged, on the ground and in the trees. I sat down on a bench nearby and tried to get a decent shot, but failed. Even though they were running around 5 feet from me, hoping I had food (I did not), I got almost no photos. They just wouldn’t sit still, or look at me. Monkeys have a way of refusing to look me in the face – it must be taken as a challenge in monkey society to stare at someone, because they rarely do it…to me, anyway. Maybe I just look like a really ugly monkey, and they can’t bear to look.

Vervets are interesting socially. They live in family groups of females and young that share and jointly defend a traditional home range. A number of attached males help defend the females and their land from “outsider” males. Babies nurse by sitting between their mothers’ legs and suckling both nipples at once.

A nursing mother vervet (above) at the Pafuri picnic spot in Kruger National Park
A mother vervet nursing her baby at Satara Rest Camp, in Kruger Park (above)

A female’s social standing is determined by her family’s rank. High-ranking families get first choice at any resource in short supply. Females of low-ranking families must defer to even youngsters of higher rank. The lower-ranking females try to improve their lot by hanging out with the “aristocrats” – grooming them, handling their babies, requesting their help to resolve disputes. But adult female vervets spend most of their time with close relatives and others of similar rank.

When male offspring mature, they have to migrate to another troop, usually during the mating season. But vervets of both sexes hate immigrants, and many of the newcomers are killed. A migrating male has a better chance if he has an older brother already in the troop he moves to. If he’s not accepted, he tries again with another troop.

Males compete with one another for social and reproductive dominance. When a group stops to feed in a grove of fruit trees, the dominant male may sit with his intimidating red penis and blue scrotum displayed as a message to intruders “Mature male on guard. Keep out!”

A dominant male (above) displays his brightly-colored genitals to keep other monkeys away from the sausage fruit (I think) he’s eating.
A female or younger male vervet (above) wants a bite of the fruit but is afraid to approach.
I wish I had more shots of vervets completely in the wild, but this is where I saw them….around human habitations, mostly inside Kruger Park, where they’re protected.

What’s their conservation status? How are they getting along in southern Africa where they’re often seen as pests? I spent some time googling “vervet monkeys conservation status” and didn’t find a whole lot. The most informative source I found was Wikipedia, under the “Vervet Monkey” entry, “Protection and Conservation”paragraphs.

I read there that vervet monkeys are not monitored and their true status is unknown. I believe it said that they are listed in CITES Appendix 2 as a species that could become threatened if their populations are not monitored. Below is a quote from Wikipedia, slightly edited for clarity.

“In spite of low predator populations in many areas where human development has encroached on wild territories, vervet monkeys are killed by electricity pylons, vehicles, dogs, pellet guns, poison and bullets, and are trapped for traditional medicine, bush meat and for biomedical research. The vervet monkey has a complex and fragile social system – their persecution is thought to have impacted on troop structures and diminishing numbers.

“According to recent distribution maps, the vervet monkey is quickly disappearing in the Western Cape of South Africa where they are heavily persecuted. The Darwin Primate Group is the only rescue and rehabilitation center for vervets in this province, with their primary goals being to find methods for humans and wildlife to co-exist, to educate the public so that the severe persecution of monkeys and baboons in this province is confronted, and to help injured and orphaned vervet monkeys in need. The center has a volunteer program to help with its goals.

“The Vervet Monkey Foundation in South Africa is working on conservation and protection of the vervets. The foundation makes use of volunteer workers from western countries.

“There is also an invasive breeding population in Florida. It is believed that they escaped from the Tarzan Set in the 1950’s, or possibly a road show.”

!!! I found that last paragraph a bit surprising! Where in Florida, I wonder?

Anyway….vervet monkeys are adaptable to human settlements, more so than most wild animals. Who knows what lies in store for them. But the spirit of persecution that seems to prevail in southern Africa reminds me of the history of the American wolf, who was hunted to virtual extinction in the United States. They’ve only recently rebounded, in a limited fashion, by the airlifting of Canadian wolves into Wyoming, and their slow natural migration southward from Canada after hunting was banned. Now hunting has been legalized again….

Wildlife needs our help. My husband and I spend all of our charity dollars on wildlife, and preservation of prime wildlife habitat. Consider making a donation to your favorite wildlife charity today. Some good ones include the World Wildlife Fund, the Natural Resources Defense Council, TRAFFIC, Conservation International, the Jane Goodall Institute, the Rainforest Action Network. Or pick a primate organization, one of the vervet organizations mentioned above. Lots of people are trying to change our present trajectory and find a different future that can include wildlife. Be one of them.

Source for vervet social behavior: Richard D. Estes The Safari Companion; A Guide to the Watching of African Mammals. Chelsea Green Publishing Company.

Key words:: South Africa primates vervet monkeys primate conservation

All photos by Sally Kneidel, PhD

Posted in Africa, Eco-travel, South Africa, Sustainable Living, Wildlife behavior Tagged with: , , , , ,

A sustainable, locally run, and off-the-grid resort in South Africa; great for birding

All photos and text by Sally Kneidel, PhD, of sallykneidel.com

Children of the Hamakuya community. Community residents find employment at the small “green” resort of Tshulu Camp, bringing needed revenue into the village.

My husband Ken consulting his bird guide on our tent’s deck in Tshulu Camp.
I’ve written a lot about supporting people in struggling nations who are trying to transition to sustainable livelihoods. One great example of local people choosing to conserve their own natural resources, and finding employment in doing so, is Tshulu Camp in northeastern South Africa. It’s operated by the Tshulu Trust, also local.

We had the good fortune to stay at Tshulu Camp, a small nature resort, this past June. The camp is completely off the grid, depending solely on PV (photovoltaic) panels to operate the lights and recharge batteries for guests. PV panels also power the pump that carries water from the well or “borehole” to the kitchen and bathrooms.

We learned about Tshulu Camp, as well as our village homestay I wrote about earlier, through friends with the Organization for Tropical Studies, an educational consortium that offers ecology courses in Costa Rica and South Africa. The OTS friends directed us to Tshulu Trust Administrator Thuseni Sigwadi, an energetic and very friendly young man.

Thuseni Sigwadi, an administrator of the Tshulu Trust and its Tshulu Camp. His job includes arranging camp stays, as well as homestays in the adjacent village of Hamakuya. His contact info is below.

Thuseni arranged everything for us, gave us driving directions, and for the homestay, he met us at the turn off into the village. Later, he rode with us from the homestay to Tshulu Camp, to help us steer our tiny VW around the most difficult rocks. As much fun as the homestay was, Tshulu Camp was just as valuable in its own way. Thuseni suggested the camp for the birding opportunities and the quiet natural setting on the Mutale River. He said Fhatuwani Makuya could serve as our nature guide while we were there.

Fhatuwani Makuya, who served as our translator during our homestay, is also a nature & birding guide at Tshulu Camp. He’s in training to be a game guard for national parks, a dangerous but fascinating job. Game guards protect wildlife from poachers. More about what we learned about poaching in a later post. You can see our previous post on rhino poaching here.

Tshulu Camp was beautiful, comfortable, quiet, and the perfect place to relax in privacy after the homestay. It has 5 guest tents, and a lovely outdoor covered dining area. The staff was so, so friendly.

The dining room at Tshulu Camp (above)
The dining room, above. We loved the “catering lady” Rosina Netshituni (in red). She fixed all our multi-course meals, which were more than scrumptious. She was happy to talk recipes with anyone who could speak a little Venda. We tried!

Much of the food prepared in the camp’s kitchen comes from their organic vegetable garden. The garden not only supplies food for the camp kitchen, but also provides employment for villagers living nearby. The vegetable garden is irrigated from underground, which is a plus, as water shortage is a big issue in Africa. The camp uses their waste sustainably too – composting all the vegetable and garden waste to enrich the soil for the organic farm. So those tasty vegetables prepared by Rosina are organically grown on fertile, composted soil!

From the deck of the dining area (above), Ken and I looked for birds along the Mutale River

A dedicated birder, Ken spent most of his free time wandering around through the bush along the riverbank looking for birds, while I was socializing. We did see quite a few birds in the area of Tshulu Camp and Hamakuya, including the Namaqua Dove, Cut-throat Finch, Red-billed Quelea, Great Rufous Sparrow, White-throated Robin Chat, and Levaillant’s Cisticola.

One thing I really appreciate is how the camp has retained the natural topography of the land and all its native plants. The spacious and luxurious tents where guests stay required no grading at all. When construction projects elsewhere grade land to make it level for roads or buildings or landscaping, the grading destroys topsoil, native plants, animal homes, and wreaks havoc with natural communities. Tshulu Camp has avoided that, which is one reason the bird life there is prolific.

There’s also no pavement in the village or at Tshulu Camp. All walkways and roads are natural substrates, allowing natural water cycles to continue unaltered. Rainfall percolates through the ground everywhere, to recharge ground water, streams, and rivers.

The deck of our tent, immersed in native flora, overlooked the Mutale River (photos above and below).
We enjoyed hangin’ out on the cool tent deck in the evenings, when not hiking, eating or schmoozing with fellow campers. What a view!The inside of our private tent.

Our private bathroom with shower, inside our tent.

Housekeepers Gladys Tshinavhe and Phellinah Ntshauba

These PV or photovoltaic panels (below) power Tshulu Camp’s lights and charged our camera batteries.

The PV panels below power the pump for the “bore-hole” (or well) that provides water for the camp.

Baobab trees were common in and around Tshulu Camp (below).


Student Erin Wilkus (below) from Reed College in the U.S was studying the baobabs at Tshulu Camp, for an academic project, while we were there.

Erin had already made friends with the children of Hamakuya and, on a short trip into the village, she stopped to play clapping games with them. Ben Zarov (in gray sweatshirt below) from Grinnell College was working at Tshulu Camp temporarily as a volunteer, doing odd jobs and helping maintain the grounds. The children loved Erin and Ben, who had both been at Tshulu Camp for a while and had learned a lot of the Venda language.
I highly recommend a stay at Tshulu Camp and a homestay at Hamakuya. If you want to go, e-mail Thuseni Sigwadi, Tshulu Trust Administrator, at tshulu@gmail.com. You can call Thuseni at 011 27 72 997 6669 (from the U.S.). He speaks excellent English. From South Africa, his number is 072 997 6669. He can arrange the whole thing for you.When you choose to visit locally owned and operated nature resorts, and particularly homestays, you learn so much more about the people and their way of life than you would in a hotel chain, or a foreign operated resort. Plus, your dollars help to empower these communities to conserve their trees, their wildlife, their wild landscapes. Dollars from ecotourism replace dollars from logging or from sale of wildlife and wildlife parts. When you support locally owned “green” tourism, you’re protecting irreplaceable natural resources for future generations.
The Tshulu Trust is working on a website that will be online shortly. I’ll post a link here or in a later post when the site is up.

All photos and text by Sally Kneidel, PhD, of sallykneidel.com

Keywords: Tshulu Trust Tshulu Camp Hamakuya birding South Africa Thuseni Sigwadi ecotravel sustainability green resorts sustainable resorts local communities Venda
Posted in Africa, Eco-travel, Energy-efficient housing, Environmental footprint, Food, Going Green (co-authored with Sadie Kneidel), South Africa, Sustainable Living, Wildlife, Wildlife behavior Tagged with: , , , , , ,

Obama to fight consolidation of farms: good news for small farms and consumers

Text and all photos by Sally Kneidel, PhD

I like Obama. Just like me, he’s tired of Smithfield and Tyson and ConAgra and all those mega food corporations running the show and fouling our food.

I heard on NPR last week that, starting in 2010, the Justice and Agriculture departments will hold town meetings in farming communities throughout the country, to learn how corporations like Smithfield are buying up small farms and wreaking havoc in agricultural markets. Obama’s Justice Department has said that scrutinizing monopolies in agriculture is a top priority. That is very good news!

Bush’s attitude was very much the opposite – he favored consolidation. His “let’s make a deal” mentality encouraged big corporations to absorb small livestock farms. A monopoly allows corporations to set whatever price they want for animal products in the grocery store. During the Bush administration, mergers were approved between Dean Co. and Suiza Corp. to create the nation’s largest milk processor; between Smithfield Foods and Premium Standard Farms to create the largest hog processor; and between JBS and Smithfield Beef to make one of the nation’s largest cattle feeders.

A sow in a farrowing crate at a farm with 40,000 hogs, under contract to Smithfield.   Photo by Sally Kneidel, PhD
A hog farm under contract to Smithfield. Veggie Revolution co-author Sadie on the left; owner on the right. Photo by Sally Kneidel

Since the 1980s, American agriculture has become increasingly concentrated. Today, less than 2 percent of farms account for half of all agricultural sales. That means a few ag companies are getting bigger and bigger, while smaller ones are disappearing. While Sadie and I were researching our book Veggie Revolution, we learned that North Carolina is losing 1000 farms a year to consolidation. Farmers told us that small farms go out of business because the corporations own most of the slaughterhouses, and the small farmer can’t find anyone reliable to process his livestock. Or…he can’t price his product as cheaply as the corporations can with their penny-shaving techniques that exploit laborers, livestock, and land.

We talked to hog farmers under contract to Smithfield who said they had tried to go independent, would prefer to be independent, but they couldn’t find a facility to slaughter their hogs. Plus, they got threatening letters from the company telling them that they wouldn’t be allowed to go independent. They weren’t really sure what that threat meant.

We talked to Tyson farmers too who said they much preferred the old days when they weren’t under contract to Tyson.

24,000 Tyson broilers crammed into each shed. Photo by Sally Kneidel
A  typical Tyson broiler shed, owned and paid for by the farmer, used by the profit-taking Tyson Corporation. Photo by Sally Kneidel

They told us that being under contract means taking a huge risk, because the farmer has to pay for the land and for each $200,000 animal shed, often mortgaging his family’s property to do so. He needs at least five sheds to make enough money to support his family in even a meager manner. The corporation likes it that way. As long as the farmer owns the land and shed, any lawsuit filed because of a leak in the farm’s animal-waste lagoon, or airborne ammonia sickening the neighbors, is filed against the farmer not the corporation. How convenient: the farmer takes the risk – the corporation reaps the profits. And if the corporation backs out of the contract, the farmer is wrecked financially, left to pay a million-dollar mortgage on 4 or 5 useless sheds.

We interviewed owners of small farms that sell eggs, and toured a Food Lion egg factory with 1.1 million hens, crammed into cages so small they had to have their beaks cut to keep them from pecking and eating each other. I don’t generally eat eggs, but I hear that the eggs from small farms, where laying hens wander around outside all day eating bugs, have lots more nutrients and flavor. I could see that even the color of the yolk was richer.

One lone hen has escaped her tiny cage at a Food Lion egg factory with 1.1 million hens. Photo by Sally Kneidel
The Food Lion hens spend their lives in cages so small they can’t stand up fully, much less preen their feathers or stretch. Photo by Sally Kneidel

Thank you Obama, for your willingness to look into this! We deserve wholesome food. Farmers deserve to make a living wage. As it is now, the corporate stockholders are making all the money.

Obama’s plan to apparently support small farms and limit consolidation is giving hope to independent farmers, who have complained for years about having fewer and fewer options, and being forced to raise livestock as if they were milk, egg, sausage, and burger machines, rather than living beings that need space and fresh air.

During the upcoming farm-town hearings, the ag dept is likely to hear from people like Don Quamby, a hog farmer from Wellsville, Mo. Quamby was interviewed on the NPR piece I heard.

“With the hogs, it’s gotten to be where you can’t make any money anymore raising them, because the packers [like Smithfield] own everything,” Quamby said.

He said he’s deeply concerned about the death of independent hog farms.

“It used to be you had several different markets that you’d go to in our area, several different buyers,” Quamby said. “Now we don’t have that.”

Asked why consumers should care about the change, Quamby said, “Well, because once the packer owns all the market, they can charge whatever price they want then at the consumer level, once the meat gets to the store.”

“I’ve got grandsons — 10, 8 and 6,” said Jim Foster, who farms in Montgomery City, Mo., “and their ability to raise hogs like I did, as an independent, depends on whether these guys do their job or not.” Foster also was interviewed for NPR.

The Justice Department said that the antitrust division plans to take a hard look at three areas of agriculture.

The first is seed companies. In some markets, Monsanto controls 90 percent of the technology behind genetically-modified seeds for cotton, corn and soybeans. Sadie and I wrote a long chapter about Monsanto in our 2008 book Going Green, about how the company sues farmers whose crops are accidently pollinated by windblown pollen from Monsanto’s genetically-modified patented plants. See the document “Monsanto vs, U.S. Farmers” by the Center for Food Safety for lots more info about Monsanto’s dirty dealings.

The second segment is beef packing. And the third is dairy, where consolidation has been especially dramatic. In the last decade, more than 4,500 dairy farms disappeared every year.

I can’t wait to see what comes of it, especially since I live in N.C., a state saturated with poultry farms, hog farms, and hog waste. We have more hogs than people – second only to Iowa in the number of swine.

God, thank you for that night in November where hopeful people pulled together and elected a man who’s courageous enough to look at everything with fresh eyes, with compassionate principles, and with his solid belief that we can do a heck of a lot better with the massive resources this country has at its disposal.

Sources:

John Burnett. “Small Farmers See Promise in Obama’s Plan.” Morning Edition. August 20, 2009. National Public Radio.

Sally Kneidel and Sadie Kneidel. 2005. Veggie Revolution: Smart Choices for a Healthy Body and a Healthy Planet. Fulcrum Publishing.

Sally Kneidel and Sadie Kneidel. 2008. Going Green: A Wise Consumer’s Guide to a Shrinking Planet. Fulcrum Publishing.

Monsanto vs. U.S. Farmers Report. 2007. Center for Food Safety.

See my previous posts about Smithfield, who is suspected of starting the swine flu pandemic:

Smithfield blamed for swine flu by Mexican Press.

This virus is a swine flu and has roots in N.C., the land of Smithfield
.

Why is swine flu likely to return in winter? It’s not because people are cooped up together in winter.

Keywords:: Obama small farms consolidation Smithfield Tyson healthy food Monsanto

Posted in Food, Going Green (co-authored with Sadie Kneidel), Sustainable Living, Veggie Revolution (co-authored with Sadie Kneidel), Wildlife Tagged with: , , ,

2009, 27 rhinos killed in just one African park; poaching increasing

Now linked to Google News – time-sensitive link

All text and photos by Sally Kneidel PhD of http://sallykneidel.com

I was surprised at how simple it was. One of the men put his foot on the drugged rhino’s massive horn, pinning the horn to a wooden block on the ground.

Then another guy revved up the chain saw and sawed the horn off her face, leaving a stump that protruded about 4 inches from the rhino’s skin.
A small plastic sheet under the rhino caught all the shavings, which were considerable.
Below, the shavings and the big horn.

The circular stump, head on, looked like a bulls-eye with its dark center.

Then the man with the chain-saw turned his attention to the second smaller horn, and sawed that off too, once again catching all the valuable shavings and flakes. The rhino was awake enough to flinch at that one, which was much closer to her eyes and ears.

The stumps of both horns on the mother rhino.

Rhino horns are made of compacted hair, so removing one shouldn’t hurt if the growth zone at the base isn’t touched. The horn will regrow about 2 inches a year, maybe twice that much if the animal is given protein supplements. A typical horn on an adult white rhino is about 22 inches.

As she lay on the ground, the rhino was grunting softly, laboring to breathe. Feeling the urge to comfort, I put my hand on her shoulder. Her skin was tough, like it looked, but I was surprised at how warm it felt- even warmer than human skin. No wonder they have so many parasites, the blood must be right under the surface.

Ken and I had been invited on this rhino capture by a couple of science friends while in Africa, in June. We’d watched while a helicopter took off with a vet, a vet tech, and a pilot to locate two rhinos from the air and to fire a tranquilizer dart from a rifle into each one.

One of the darts, after it was removed.

After a mother rhino and her year-old-baby were located and successfully darted, Ken and I and a group of other scientists had to find the fallen beasts in the dense African bush, not an easy task. The rhinos ran quite a ways before the drug brought them down. The plan was to take samples and measurements from the sedated pair, then inject an antidote to wake them and lead them into two cages on a flatbed truck.

The reason for the capture was that the rhino and her baby had been sold. They were moving from a wildlife preserve into private hands, to raise money for the preserve. The new private owner had requested that the mother have her horn removed to protect her from poachers. I had mixed feelings about that.

The new owner was operating under the theory that a rhino without horns is less likely to be killed by poachers, which may or may not be true – I don’t know. Rhino poaching is a real danger, having increased in southern Africa 3-fold between 2005 and August of 2009. In Kruger Park alone, 27 rhinos have been killed in 2009. Rhino horns stored at Addo National Park were stolen in a violent armed robbery in July of ’09. Just last night I got an email from a friend in South Africa that “Heidi,” the only white rhino at Thula Thula preserve, has just been shot and killed by poachers who hacked off her horn.

Rhino horn is extremely valuable, for two main markets. It’s sold to Asian countries, especially China, Taiwan, and South Korea, for use in traditional medicines. And it’s sold to Middle Eastern countries such as Yemen and Oman, where it’s used to make ornately carved handles for ceremonial daggers. We were told, while in Africa, that much of the rhino poaching is instigated by well-organized Asian syndicates, which may hire impoverished locals to do the dirty and dangerous work. It may take 3 days to track a rhino – which is invariably shot and killed before the horn is sawed or hacked off. An average-sized horn can sell for $24,000 on the black market. The scientists we went out with said the horns sell for $6,000 per kilo, and the mama’s horn that we saw weighed about 4 kilos.

So, does removing the horns protect rhinos from poaching? We were told by a variety of sources, including rangers and poaching guards, that removing horns from a rhino does little to protect it. Poachers will still go after a dehorned rhino and shoot it, because even the stump is valuable. And if the stump too is gone, we heard, the trackers will kill the rhino just so they won’t waste 3 days tracking the same useless animal again.

So back to the scene… the drugged mama and baby rhino…. as soon as we located the darted rhinos lying down and sedated, the group of scientists on the ground split into two teams to work respectively on the mother and baby. Cloths were tied around their eyes as blindfolds. A soft cloth ball the size of a tennis ball was stuffed into each ear to shut out sounds, to keep the animals calm.

Above, ear plugs for the mother (the black balls), put in place before the sampling and cutting began.

The teams took blood, hair, skin, and tissue samples, measured the animals’ temperature and pulse, inspected the teeth and various other body parts, and clamped ID tags to their ears.

Below, the sampling materials in the truck before the work began.
The pulse is checked (below).

One graduate student plucked green Amblyoma ticks from around each rhino’s anus. Below, the round ticks are visible in the skin creases. The mother’s tail is in the lower right of the photo below. I’m not sure what the white stuff is – maybe an antiseptic or a pesticide.

The ticks on most of their skin are plucked off by oxpeckers – birds that specialize in eating external parasites from large African herbivores. But I guess the birds can’t get to an anus that’s covered by a tail. I like almost all animals, including invertebrates, but I have to admit that the dozens of ticks around the mother’s moist anus were a bit unsavory.

It was during this sampling and measuring that the mom’s horns were sawed off. The shavings and flakes, which were considerable, were saved because of their value. We were told that they will be stored in a secure vault. For what, or until when, I don’t know.

After all the sampling was done, a vet injected the antidote into the 10-yr-old mom and her yearling son, leaving the blindfolds in place.


After just a couple of minutes, the rhinos started to wake up. A bunch of people started trying to roll the rhinos so that their legs would be under them (the mother, below).


The rhinos were then urged and pushed and pulled into a sitting position (the mother, below).


Then the two animals were pulled and prodded toward the cages and truck that would take them to their new home (the mother, below).


As I ran beside the mother rhino, she passed saplings – and trampled them. She didn’t go around anything, but smashed everything in her way. Of course she couldn’t see where she was going. I felt sorry for her – she had no idea where her baby was, unless her keen sense of smell told her.

We soon arrived at the cage for the mother. She was pulled with the rope, and pushed from behind , and walked easily enough into the cage.


The heavy cage door was lowered by a crane, and then the crane lifted the cage onto the flatbed truck. The baby was already in his cage on the truck, which had room for both cages (below).


Then it started to drizzle. So instead of driving the rhinos 80 some miles in a drizzle and risk their getting a respiratory infection, the decision was made to release them temporarily into a nearby holding pen that was forested and quite extensive. We drove there, the crane put the cages on the ground, and the blindfolds and earplugs were removed. Mom and babe were both released, and the rhinos rejoined one another immediately (below).


They then began to trot away from us (below).

But baby stopped, and turned around to stare at us.

“What the heck was that?,” he must have wondered. He may have never seen a human before. Someone clapped and yelled to shoo him and he turned to follow his mother (below).


Rhino conservation: the good and the bad
I didn’t know when we were in Africa how threatened or endangered the southern white rhino is. As it turns out, they are classified as Near Threatened (NT) on the IUCN Red List. I did know that they’re the largest land animal, after the African and Asian elephants. They’re larger than any other rhino species. We saw them on lots of outings in reserves – they were fairly common in southern Africa. I knew that white rhinos are really named for their “wide” and squarish upper lip. Africa’s black rhinos, which are much more rare and may be extinct in the wild, have a narrow prehensile upper lip that they use for browsing. Black rhinos are particularly vulnerable to poaching because they must have water daily and they return to the same water hole every day. Sometimes water holes are poisoned to kill the rhinos (and everything else that uses it).

Although the white rhino population in southern Africa is doing relatively well at present, they almost went extinct. In 1895, there were only 20 to 50 animals alive in the wild. Today, the population of white rhinos in southern Africa has grown to 17,500, with 750 more in captive breeding programs around the world, according to ARKive. I don’t know how they got from 50 to 17,500, but it’s a nice success story.

Still, white rhinos remain in danger due to habitat loss, the recent surge in poaching, and widespread poverty which affects human priorities. Africa is the only continent where poverty is increasing, due to human population growth, recurrent droughts, HIV, and a history of colonization and exploitation.

Poverty is a contributing factor
In some of the rural villages we visited in southern Africa, we were told that local people often enter national parks illegally to poach wildlife for food or for sale, and to gather firewood to use or to sell, when nearby sources are depleted. It’s the hierarchy of needs….if your kids are hungry, you do what you need to do to feed them. If you can. We also heard that rhino poachers are often shot on sight by poaching patrols. You can tell a rhino poacher, we were told, because they carry high caliber rifles – not the snares and homemade traps that local people use to catch smaller animals.

But the main driver of rhino poaching is the demand in consumer countries Recently, Vietnamese operators have been especially active in poaching rhinos from southern Africa, or in hiring local people to do it. That’s according to TRAFFIC, an international NGO that monitors illegal trade in wildlife. David Newton of TRAFFIC reported that “very senior members of the Vietnamese government claim to have been cured of certain terminal diseases by the use of rhino horn……so that seems to be where the demand is coming from.” Newton added that rhino horn has no medicinal qualities. It’s hard for me to stomach the news that government officials are promoting the poaching of rhinos. Do they know that rhino horns are no different chemically than hair??

A white rhino with its horns intact.

Do rhinos need the horns?
As I watched the mother rhino and her youngster led through this bewildering series of events that left the mother hornless, I wondered about their safety. Doesn’t she need her horn to protect the baby from predators? Maybe. But we were told, and observed for ourselves, that rhinos will trample whatever they want to trample. The trampling is more likely to kill you than the horn. Each dangerous animal has its way. A Cape Buffalo will pick you up with its horns and toss you into the air. A hippo “will bite you in half” we heard, if you get between the hippo and its river. But a rhino will just run right over you as though you weren’t even there. Each animal deserves distance and respect for different reasons! Rhinos do use their horns in social confrontations, but usually only in slight horn butting, false charges, and displays.

As the two wandered off into the trees after their ordeal, neither mom nor baby seemed to pay any attention to the absence of her horn – but who knows what was in her mind…or what their future will be. At least, I feel confident that she won’t wind up on a “trophy” shooting reserve. For who would pay thousands of dollars to hang a rhino head with a bulls-eye stump on his living room wall?

All text and photos by Sally Kneidel PhD of http://sallykneidel.com

Post script from a friend at TRAFFIC:
After I wrote this post, I got this e-mail from friend and colleague Richard Thomas, who works for TRAFFIC The Wildlife Monitoring Network:
“You may have seen that we [TRAFFIC] submitted a technical document, with WWF and IUCN, to CITES in July, highlighting the sudden alarming urge in rhino poaching — and issued a press release about its main findings that got a lot of publicity. The release is here, where you can download the
report too:

http://www.traffic.org/home/2009/7/9/poaching-crisis-as-rhino-horn-demand-booms-in-asia.html

Vietnam is certainly emerging as the country that’s driving the rhino
horn demand. Whilst you’re right to flag that poverty is a significant
factor in poaching of animals, research by TRAFFIC indicates that the
main driver is actually the demand for the products in the consumer
countries; and the Vietnam situation appears to be following that model.”
I amended my post above slightly after receiving this helpful point from
Richard Thomas.

Sources:
Personal communication with game control scientists, vet techs, biologists, poaching guards, rangers, wildlife guides in Africa.

ARKive: Images of Life on Earth

Rhino Horn the Cure for Serious Diseases? International Rhino Foundation, Aug 6, 2009

TRAFFIC: the wildlife monitoring network. www.traffic.org

More resources:
International Rhino Foundation:
http://www.rhinos-irf.org/white

IUCN SSC African Rhino Specialist Group:
http://www.rhinos-irf.org/afrsg

Keywords:: white rhino poaching threats to rhinos habitat loss Africa

Posted in Wildlife

Leopard adventure: male and female clash over prey

An adult male leopard full and sleeping.
All photos and text by Sally Kneidel, PhD

In my last post, on lions, I said that most of the wildlife-watchers we met in Africa seem to have cats at the top of their “must-see” list – although none of the big cats are easy to find. I wrote in that post that lions are rapidly declining. But in southern Africa, leopards and cheetahs are even more rare than lions. The “Visitors’ Guide to Kruger National Park” says the park has only half as many leopards as lions, and only 1/10 as many cheetahs as lions! (2000 lions, 1000 leopards, 200 cheetahs)

Even though rare, leopards have the broadest range of all the world’s big cats. They live across both Africa and Asia, from deserts to high mountains, in warm and cold climates. Leopards are much more adaptable than lions. I’ve read that leopards can survive with only the water that’s in their prey – no drinking water. Not sure if that’s true, but it is true that they need very little drinking water. Their adaptability has helped them survive droughts and loss of habitat in Africa and Asia, although apparently all subspecies of leopard are listed as endangered by the IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), according to Earth’s Endangered Creatures.

Because they are so widespread, and because there are at least nine subspecies across Africa and Asia, I couldn’t find an estimate of the total number of leopards remaining just in Africa.

What I know for sure is what I’ve seen. Spotting a leopard is different from seeing a lion or a group of lions. First of all, unlike lions, leopards are solitary. Adults meet only to mate, period. They never hunt together as lions do, even if two leopards’ territories overlap. Leopards are elusive, slinky, graceful. Clever. If you see one cross the road way ahead of you, keep an eye on the road behind you. You may see him recross the road after he thinks you’re gone and not paying attention.

We didn’t expect to see leopards on either trip to Africa, but we did, on both trips. In June this year, the first one we saw was hiding in tall grass, in the morning light. (Leopards hunt at night or early morning.) The black rosettes on his tawny fur were effective camouflage – the cat was hard to spot. But there he was, dozing, eyes shut with his head held erect. Maybe he was listening for prey, I don’t know. They do eat scrub hares and sometimes rodents or even invertebrates. I say “he” because it was a big leopard, and males are much bigger than females.

The big male leopard was dozing – or listening for prey – in the morning sun.

Later that morning, in a protected area just west of Kruger National Park, part of “Greater Kruger”, we saw a different leopard on the move. She was going somewhere, walking at a brisk pace (below). As you can see in the photo, the leopards in southern Africa have squarish rosettes on their coat. (East African leopards have roundish rosettes.)

Sometimes she moved down the same sandy track we were driving on (below).

Sometimes she cut through the bush (below), and eventually we lost sight of her.


But that night, we came upon a female leopard hunting. It was a moment of electric excitement for me. She was trotting down the sand road we were slowly driving down, in front of us. We turned on the parking lights and followed her at a distance. The leopards there are accustomed to animal-viewing vehicles in the bush, they don’t pay much attention as long you stay in the car. After a couple of minutes we came to a herd of impala in a dark field beside the sand road. Impala are mid-sized antelope, just the right size for a leopard.

Impala in the area, but not the same herd we saw that night.

The leopard saw them, too, and she stopped. We turned off the parking lights and cut the engine, behind her. It was now pitch dark, and the impala didn’t see her. They could smell her, though, because they started making the wheezy alarm snort they make to each another when they’re freaked out, when a predator is near. And this really shocked me: the leopard dropped to a crouch on the road, ready to pounce – right beside our vehicle! I swear she was only 5 feet from the front left tire (photo below).

She was watching the impala, ready for the right moment to spring. I thanked God fervently that I was still alive to experience such a moment. I tried to just soak it in. I thought about all the hours I’d spend at my desk at work to pay for this trip!! But here I was! Yay!

And then we waited. And waited. And waited. We sat for probably an hour waiting for her to decide that it was the right moment to pounce. I’ve read that leopards prefer a distance of 5 meters before pouncing. Anything farther than 20 meters is too far. I guess she was waiting for one of the impala to wander to within a distance of 5 – 20 meters, and maybe that never happened. I don’t know. We could still hear the impala snorting the whole time, although we couldn’t see them in the dark. We could only see the leopard when I turned on a tiny red light on my camera (or the one time I took a picture).

Anyway, we finally gave up and left. It was well into the night and we were tired.

The next morning we went back and I hoped so much we’d find her with an impala carcass up a tree. But we didn’t. Maybe we just didn’t see it.

In 2007, we had a leopard experience that was even more startling. We were on a game drive in an open jeep, in a protected area not too far from the area I just described – west of the park, in Greater Kruger. Driving along a sandy dirt track in the bush, we crossed a river at a shallow spot, then driving uphill, we came upon a dead warthog hanging on a branch in a tree. Leopards typically drag their prey into trees to keep hyenas and lions from stealing their prey, neither of which can climb as high or as easily as leopards. So we stopped and waited. Within five minutes we saw an adult female leopard walking calmly out of the riverine bushes and reeds on our left toward the tree with the warthog, crossing the dirt track in front of us (below).


She totally ignored us, crossing the dirt track, and sprang nimbly up the slanted tree trunk with no effort at all to start to work on the warthog. But then, but then…..a huge male leopard sprang up from the dense brush. I’m not kidding. It was his warthog, apparently, or else he had stolen it from the female. In an instant he was up the tree, lying on the warthog’s head, and snarling at the female so viciously that she backed hastily up a small branch to get away from him. In the photo below, you can see the female at the top of the picture backed up a narrow branch, her left front paw dangling in the air. The male is in the middle of the picture, just below the female’s dangling paw. The dead warthog’s entire brown back is visible, draped across the branch. You can see his skinny right rear leg hanging at the bottom of the picture. (Click on any picture to enlarge it.)

After an awkward moment the female lept to the right onto the main branch, and made her way down the branch, away from the angry male.

The male stood up and snarled at her as she lingered on the branch. In the photo above, the warthog’s neck is bent to the left, hung over the smaller branch. You can see his head and snout just below the leopard’s belly. His body dangles below.

Then the male lay down and clutched his warthog, glaring at the female (above).

The smaller female gave up, walked to the end of the branch and jumped to the ground (photo above).


With one look back, she turned and walked slowly back into the brush along the river (above).


The male leopard relaxed then, lay down on the branch near his dead warthog, closed his eyes and snoozed. His belly looked full, although the warthog looked intact. I guess he was saving it for later.

I don’t imagine I’ll ever see another wildlife sight as dramatic as that, unless I see a predator actually make a kill. Maybe one of these days. But I do thank God that I am alive in a time when these incredibly inspiring animals still walk the Earth. I don’t know how much longer that’ll be. What if I was born 100 years from now instead? Or 50 years from now? Would they still be here?

What are the threats to leopards?

The biggest threat is habitat loss for their prey animals, due to human population growth and human activities such as agriculture, raising livestock, mining, etc. Then there’s the biggie that will ultimately alter all habitats: climate change.

Beyond that, leopards have long been preyed upon by humans. Leopards are killed for their soft, beautiful fur which brings a high price on the black market. The tail, claws and whiskers of leopards are popular as fetishes, the whiskers used in potions. Like other powerful animals, leopards’ body parts are used in traditional medicines to (supposedly) confer on the user some characteristic of the leopard. The illegal trade in animals and animal parts is the third most lucrative black market trade in the world, second only to drugs and arms, according to Interpol.   (See the website of TRAFFIC and my prior posts on Veggie Revolution for more info about that.)

Like lions, leopards are popular with trophy hunters too, on “canned” hunts. Just click google images for “leopard trophy hunt Africa” and take a look at the photos of “trophies” (guys with rifles holding dead leopards) and ads for canned hunts.

In some areas farmers try to exterminate leopards to protect their livestock, with snares, traps, or poison. Kermit the Frog said “It’s not easy bein’ green,” but how about this: It’s not easy being a big cat in Africa. In sub-Saharan Africa, nearly every country has an agrarian economy, and livestock play a big part in that. Cats can be the enemy. They do eat livestock if they can’t find their natural prey.

So, as I said with lions, solutions must include reimbursing farmers and herders for livestock lost. Solutions can include community groups that take turns watching for predators. And hopefully, solutions will include grass-roots tourism. Helping local people transition from livelihoods that destroy, overgraze, and otherwise degrade habitat to livelihoods that depend on keeping habitats and wildlife alive and intact. Americans, Europeans, and Asians bring billions of dollars into Africa every year, looking for wildlife to photograph. What if all of that went into the hands of local people who would otherwise be raising livestock to feed their family? What if?

If you go to Africa, or any destination that’s a wildlife hotspot, find out where your dollars are really going. If you need help, leave a comment after this post and I’ll respond.

From home, you can join conservation organizations that protect big cats and their prey. You can encourage stores not to carry fur coats; encourage people not to buy or wear fur. You can also do what you can to reduce the human impact on the environment. The actions of people in industrialized nations profoundly affect people and wildlife in developing nations all around the world.

Sources:
African Wildlife Foundation (www.awf.org)

Hunters take out Kruger’s animals. African Conservation Foundation. (www.africanconservation.org)

South Africa: Limpopo Leopards in Danger. African Conservation Foundation.

(www.africanconservation.org)

Earth’s Endangered Creatures
http://www.earthsendangered.com

Additional resources:

TRAFFIC:  the wildlife trade monitoring network

Key words:: leopards Africa South Africa conservation endangered habitat loss global warming

Posted in Wildlife

What’s this blog about?

These days, I blog mostly about nature and wildlife. Even the tiniest creatures make me happy! You'll also find here lots of posts about plant-based foods, health, and ecotourism. Ecotourism can support local people who make a living through sustainable use of wildlife, habitat, and natural resources.

Amazon Page

My Amazon page shows most of my books (click here)

Archive of Posts

Categories

Link to our other blog, Veggie Revolution

Our other blog, Veggie Revolution, focuses more on food than this one does, especially the environmental, health and humane aspects of our food choices. That blog was started in 2005 and continues today, while the blog you're reading now began in 2009. Some of the newer posts are on both blogs, but Veggie Rev has at least 260 more posts than this blog, including Sadie's travels to Morocco. In the sidebar of Veggie Rev, you'll see links to each year that can take you back to all the posts for a particular year.

Veggie Revolution blog